Fascial Manipulation Australia

For Clinicians

The Science Behind Fascial Manipulation

Most clinical training builds the body from bones, joints and named muscles. That model works well for a fracture or a tear. It struggles with pain that moves, stiffness with no matching lesion, or a problem that keeps coming back. This page sets out what research now shows about fascia, the tissue that model leaves out, and what it does and doesn’t yet tell us about treatment.

40+
Years of clinical development of the method
20+
Years of fascia research at the University of Padua
400+
Peer-reviewed publications from the Stecco research group
The Basics

What Fascia Is

Fascia is easiest to understand as a system rather than a single tissue. A 2025 paper by an international group of anatomists describes the fascial system as a layered, body-wide network of connective tissue that lets tension be carried and lets neighbouring layers slide over one another.[1]

Throughout that network, two kinds of layer alternate. Collagen-rich layers are relatively stiff and carry load. Between them sit thinner, looser layers rich in hyaluronan, a molecule that binds water and lets adjacent layers glide.[1] Specialised cells within fascia, called fasciacytes, are among those thought to help maintain this gliding layer.[2]

That pairing of strength and mobility is the thread running through everything below.

The layers from skin to muscle, with the deep fascia magnifiedA block of tissue showing epidermis, dermis, superficial adipose tissue, superficial fascia, deep adipose tissue, deep fascia and muscle, with the deep fascia magnified to show three collagen layers with fibres running in different directions, separated by loose connective tissue containing hyaluronan and fasciacytes, above the epimysium and muscle. Epidermis Dermis Superficial adipose tissue (SAT) with retinacula cutis superficialis (skin ligaments) Superficial fascia Deep adipose tissue (DAT) with retinacula cutis profundus Deep fascia Muscle Deep fascia (magnified) Collagen layer 1 Loose connective tissue hyaluronan, fasciacytes Collagen layer 2 Loose connective tissue lets the layers glide Collagen layer 3 Epimysium & muscle
The layers from skin to muscle, with the deep fascia magnified to show collagen layers separated by hyaluronan-rich loose connective tissue.[1, 2] Click or tap to enlarge

Superficial fascia

The layered connective tissue beneath the skin.

Deep (musculoskeletal) fascia

Wraps and links muscles, and includes tendons, ligaments, joint capsules and the connective tissue within muscle.

Visceral fascia

Supports and separates the internal organs.

Neural fascia

Surrounds peripheral nerves, the brain and the spinal cord.

The four parts of the fascial system as grouped in the 2025 proposal.[1] Fascial Manipulation works mainly with the deep fascia in Levels 1 and 2.

From Packing Material to Recognised System

What Happened to Fascia

For most of the twentieth century, fascia was the tissue anatomists cut through to reach the structures underneath, and it was largely treated as inert packing material. Part of the reason is practical: traditional specimen preparation destroys the very properties that make fascia interesting. Layers that glide independently in a living body fuse into a single stiff sheet once preserved.

Over the past two decades that view has been steadily revised, with much of the anatomical work coming from the Stecco research group at the University of Padua.[3, 4] Even the definition of fascia is still being refined, which is part of why the word is used so loosely in clinical conversation.[1, 5]

Fascial insertions of biceps brachiiBiceps brachii inserts into bone through its tendons and into the deep (aponeurotic) fascia of the forearm through the lacertus fibrosus. Proximal insertions into bone (short & long head tendons) Biceps brachii muscle Epimysial fascia of biceps brachii Aponeurotic fascia (brachial fascia) Myofascial expansion (lacertus fibrosus): distal insertion into deep fascia Biceps tendon distal insertion into bone

Biceps brachii is a simple example of what the older model missed: alongside its tendon into bone, it inserts into the deep fascia of the forearm through the lacertus fibrosus.

Two Functional Roles

What Fascia Does

01It connects muscles into a working network

Muscles are wrapped in connective tissue from the individual fibre outwards, and that tissue is continuous with the deep fascia. Force produced by a muscle doesn’t only travel along its tendon to bone. A meaningful share is transmitted sideways, through fascia, to neighbouring muscles.[4, 6, 7] Animal and laboratory studies suggest fascia can carry up to around 30% of a muscle’s force. Studies in living people also support force transmission through fascia, but most are small, and how much force it carries in the human body isn’t yet known.[8]

A systematic review of dissection studies found strong anatomical evidence for some of the proposed muscle-to-muscle connections, such as the line running from the sole of the foot, up the back of the leg, to the lower back. It found little or no evidence for others, and noted that whether these connections matter clinically still needs to be tested.[9] A 2025 review reached a similar conclusion: the anatomical continuity is well documented, while its functional significance is still being worked out.[8]

Fascia is also not entirely passive. It contains contractile cells called myofibroblasts, which in laboratory studies can change fascial tension, although how much this matters in the living body is unclear.[8]

The low back shows these connections especially clearly. Here the thoracolumbar fascia acts as a crossroads, where muscles from the arm and shoulder (latissimus dorsi and trapezius), the hip and thigh (gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris by way of the sacrotuberous ligament) and the trunk all attach. In dissection studies, pulling on latissimus dorsi or gluteus maximus moved this fascia across the midline to the opposite side, so the shoulder on one side and the hip on the other can both put it under tension. The thoracolumbar fascia also wraps the back muscles in a tight sheath, which is thought to help them support the lower spine.[36]

These connections are also visible in how people move. In chronic low back pain, changes in muscle recruitment can be seen along the kinetic chain, from the neck to the lower leg, not only in the back itself.[30] Injury elsewhere has a similar reach: after an ankle sprain, or with chronic ankle instability, the activation of muscles at the hip and trunk changes too.[31, 32] One proposal is that fascia helps organise muscles into coordinated groups, so a problem in one part of a chain can change how the whole chain is recruited.[33]

Together, these are reasons a problem in one area could load or alter a distant but connected region, and part of the rationale for assessing beyond the painful area.

Posterior myofascial continuityA longitudinal pathway from erector spinae through the sacrotuberous ligament to the hamstrings, and an oblique pathway from latissimus dorsi through the thoracolumbar fascia to the opposite gluteus maximus and iliotibial tract. Latissimus dorsi Erector spinae Deep fibres of gluteus maximus into the sacrotuberous ligament Sacrotuberous ligament continuous with the hamstrings Ischiocrural muscles (hamstrings) Latissimus dorsi Thoracolumbar fascia Superficial fibres of gluteus maximus into the thoracolumbar fascia and iliotibial tract Iliotibial tract and lateral intermuscular septum Longitudinal continuity erector spinae → sacrotuberous ligament → hamstrings Spiral continuity latissimus dorsi → thoracolumbar fascia → opposite gluteus maximus → iliotibial tract
Two continuities through gluteus maximus. Its deep fibres link the erector spinae to the hamstrings, a longitudinal connection between spine and leg (red). Its superficial fibres insert into the thoracolumbar fascia above and the iliotibial tract below, a spiral connection between one leg and the opposite latissimus dorsi (dark).[36] Click or tap to enlarge
Upper limb fascial connectionsMyofascial expansions link pectoralis major, biceps, brachialis, flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus and the thenar muscles through the brachial and antebrachial fascia. Expansion of pectoralis major into the brachial fascia Brachial fascia Biceps brachii belly removed, tendons kept Brachialis origin from the medial intermuscular septum Antebrachial fascia Thenar fascia Expansions of palmaris longus and flexor carpi radialis into the thenar fascia Origin of flexor carpi radialis and palmaris longus from the antebrachial fascia Lacertus fibrosus inserted into the antebrachial fascia Flexor carpi radialis Antebrachial fascia Flexor pollicis brevis origin from the anterior carpal retinaculum
An anterior chain for bringing the arm forward (antepulsion). The clavicular fibres of pectoralis major, brachialis arising from the intermuscular septa, the lacertus fibrosus, and flexor carpi radialis and palmaris longus expanding into the flexor retinaculum and thenar eminence together tension the front of the brachial and antebrachial fascia as the arm moves forward. Click or tap to enlarge
Lower limb fascial connectionsPosterior view of the right lower limb showing the superficial fibres of gluteus maximus inserting into the iliotibial tract and its deep fibres into the sacrotuberous ligament, where biceps femoris arises, with biceps femoris and fibularis longus connecting with the crural fascia. Gluteus maximus Superficial fibres of gluteus maximus into the iliotibial tract Deep fibres of gluteus maximus into the sacrotuberous ligament Sacrotuberous ligament origin of biceps femoris Iliotibial tract Biceps femoris Myofascial expansion of biceps femoris into the crural fascia Fibularis longus inserting into the crural fascia Crural fascia Fibularis longus Fascia lata Semitendinosus & semimembranosus Crural fascia RIGHT LOWER LIMB · POSTERIOR VIEW
The fascia lata links the lower limb. The superficial fibres of gluteus maximus insert into the iliotibial tract and its deep fibres into the sacrotuberous ligament, where biceps femoris arises. Biceps femoris sends fibres into the crural fascia near the knee, and fibularis longus arises from that same area. Contracting gluteus maximus can therefore tension the iliotibial tract and stretch the attachments of fibularis longus, activating its muscle spindles. Click or tap to enlarge
Linea alba as a central anchorFront view of the abdominal wall with the linea alba running from the sternum to the pubic symphysis. Arrows show pectoralis major pulling up and outwards, the abdominal muscles pulling sideways, and the adductors and pectineus pulling down and outwards, with lines from each side crossing over the linea alba. Pectoralis major Abdominal muscles Adductors & pectineus Pectoralis major Abdominal muscles Adductors & pectineus Linea alba
Myofascial expansions from pectoralis major, the abdominal muscles, and the adductors and pectineus all act on the rectus sheath, meeting at the linea alba, with lines from each side crossing the midline. Click or tap to enlarge

02It is a sensory organ

Deep fascia carries a dense network of free nerve endings and several types of mechanoreceptor. In several anatomical studies the deep fascia was more densely innervated than the muscle beneath it.[4, 10, 11] That gives fascia a role in proprioception: the ankle retinacula, for example, appear to act as specialised proprioceptive structures rather than simple tendon restraints.[12]

The same innervation means fascia can contribute to pain. When a pain-provoking solution was injected into the thoracolumbar fascia of healthy volunteers, it produced more intense and more widespread pain than the same injection into muscle.[13] This is one reason fascia is considered a possible contributor to back pain that has no clear structural cause.[14]

The thoracolumbar fascia is a good example. Studies consistently find it richly supplied with free nerve endings, including ones that carry pain signals, and it also contains a dense network of sympathetic nerve fibres, which may help explain why back pain can be influenced by stress.[11, 36] Older studies also described Pacini, Ruffini and Golgi–Mazzoni corpuscles here, but these have not been confirmed by more recent studies.[11, 36] Because this layer sits well away from the joints of the spine, nerve endings that respond to stretch may be activated by everyday movements, not only by end-of-range ones.[36]

Fascia’s sensory role also feeds into motor control. Retinacula, the local thickenings of deep fascia around joints, are especially well supplied with nerves, more so than the neighbouring ligaments,[12, 25] and damage to them after ankle sprain has been linked with ongoing symptoms.[26] Because fascia feeds information into movement control, changes in it may alter how muscles are recruited, both locally and further along the kinetic chain.[27, 31, 32] Muscle spindles appear to be affected too: in animal studies, the connective tissue around them thickened after injury, which may blunt what they sense, and this was reversed when the muscle was activated.[28, 29] The second diagram below (Three pathways to dysfunction) draws these ideas into a working model.

Sensory receptors in the fasciaeBody map of free nerve endings, Pacini, Ruffini and Golgi–Mazzoni corpuscles and muscle spindles reported in different fasciae and retinacula, with a key explaining each receptor. ANTERIOR POSTERIOR Masseter fascia FNE Brachial & antebrachial fascia FNE Palmar fascia FNE Pacini Ruffini Knee retinacula FNE Ruffini Ankle retinacula FNE Pacini Ruffini Golgi–Mazzoni (rare) Trapezius fascia FNE Thoracolumbar fascia FNE Gluteal fascia FNE Spindles Plantar fascia FNE Pacini Ruffini RECEPTOR KEY FNE Free nerve endings Bare, unencapsulated nerve endings. Detect pain, temperature and mechanical stimuli. Nociception: a likely source of fascial pain and sensitisation. Pacini Pacini corpuscles Layered, onion-like capsule. Detect vibration and rapid pressure changes (fast-adapting). Proprioception: signal the onset and speed of movement. Ruffini Ruffini corpuscles Spindle-shaped capsule. Detect sustained stretch and tension in the tissue (slow-adapting). Proprioception: signal joint position and sustained tension. Spindles Muscle spindles Embedded in the perimysium, between muscle fibres. Detect muscle length and speed of stretch. Proprioception and motor control; fascial tension can influence them. Golgi–Mazzoni (rare) Golgi–Mazzoni corpuscles Small Pacini-like corpuscles. Sensitive to pressure and compression (fast-adapting). Proprioception: signal compression of the tissue. Sensory receptors in the fasciae
Receptor types reported in different fasciae and retinacula, with what each one detects.[11, 12, 25, 36] Click or tap to enlarge
Fascial dysfunction: three pathways, one cycleThree proposed pathways, local densification, retinacular dysfunction along the kinetic chain and distal excess tone, converging on joint imbalance and pain, with feedback loops. Fascial dysfunction: three pathways, one cycle Local densification, distal overstretch and retinacular dysfunction converge on joint imbalance and pain LOCAL · DENSIFICATION Densification of the epimysial fascia Muscle spindles embedded in this fascia cannot fully perceive stretch Co-activation of the muscle fibres linked to these spindles is blocked Parts of the muscle cannot take part in the intended movement KINETIC CHAIN · RETINACULA Altered retinaculum (densification, injury or thickening) Altered proprioceptive input from receptors in the retinaculum Altered timing and feedforward activation along the kinetic chain Altered muscle activity both distal and proximal to the retinaculum DISTAL · EXCESS TONE Excessive basal tone of a muscle Its myofascial expansions are overstretched Only specific portions of the fascia in the distal segment are stretched Muscle spindles linked to this fascia are chronically stretched Alpha motor neurons keep activating the muscle fibres linked to these spindles Chronic contraction of some muscle fibres, with increased acetylcholine Imbalance of joint movement Joint pain, referred pain and altered range of motion Compensation alters fascial loading Sustained contraction maintains tone Fascia Nervous system Muscle Joint / clinical
A working model of how altered fascial sensation could feed into motor control and pain. The feedback loops are clinical reasoning rather than established findings.[27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32] Click or tap to enlarge

Fascia is richly innervated, so it can contribute to pain that imaging doesn’t explain.

The Clinical Target

When Fascia Stops Gliding

Densification is the term Fascial Manipulation uses for a localised loss of glide between fascial layers. The current model is that the hyaluronan-rich loose connective tissue becomes thicker and more viscous, so neighbouring layers no longer slide freely.[15]

This is different from fibrosis, a structural change in which the collagen fibres themselves are altered. Densification is therefore considered potentially reversible, while fibrosis is a longer-lasting change to the tissue.[15] Proposed contributors to densification include reduced movement, overload, and inflammation after injury or surgery.[15, 16]

Normal versus densified deep fasciaIn normal fascia hyaluronan lubricates the loose connective tissue so each collagen layer glides independently; in densified fascia the matrix thickens and adjacent layers move together. Normal Densified Altered hyaluronan Collagen layer 1 Loose connective tissue hyaluronan-rich Collagen layer 2 Loose connective tissue Collagen layer 3 Epimysium & muscle Aggregated hyaluronan ↑ viscosity of the matrix Layers no longer glide independently Collagen layers unchanged densification ≠ fibrosis Hyaluronan lubricates the loose connective tissue, so each collagen layer glides independently. Hyaluronan aggregates and the matrix thickens, so adjacent layers are drawn along together.
Densification changes the loose connective tissue between the collagen layers, not the collagen itself. Click or tap to enlarge

In people with chronic low back pain, ultrasound has shown reduced shear strain, meaning less gliding, in the thoracolumbar fascia compared with people without back pain.[17] A 2025 review found the deep fascia was generally the same thickness or thicker in people with low back pain, with large variation between individuals and between studies.[18] Cadaver work has also compared hyaluronan content in densified areas with the surrounding fascia.[19]

Ultrasound is increasingly used to assess fascia, but methods are not yet standardised and results depend on the operator, so these measures are still mainly research tools.[20] For a plain-English summary, see how densification differs from scar tissue.

The Treatment Rationale

Can Treatment Change It?

Not in the way people often assume. Hands-on treatment can’t remodel collagen fibres in a few minutes: collagen is a stable structural protein, and changing its architecture takes sustained loading over months.

What manual treatment is thought to influence is the hyaluronan-rich loose connective tissue between the layers. Its viscosity appears to respond to temperature, hydration and mechanical stress.[15] Fascial Manipulation aims to restore glide in that layer, rather than to stretch or reshape collagen.

Researchers have started measuring this directly. A specialised MRI technique, T1ρ mapping, can distinguish water bound to glycosaminoglycans such as hyaluronan from free water in the tissue. Using it, a case series of people with chronic elbow pain found a measurable shift in the balance of bound and free water within the deep fascia after three sessions of Fascial Manipulation.[34] Other studies have reported local temperature rises after treatment, and animal studies point to anti-inflammatory and pain-modulating effects.[21] Work on these mechanisms is ongoing.

A 2023 review from the Padua and New York groups proposes why friction may produce a more lasting change than heat alone. Warmth on its own loosens the aggregated hyaluronan chains, so the tissue softens, but as it cools the chains can re-aggregate and the area tends to return to its densified state. Deep friction adds mechanical shear, which is thought to break the aggregated chains into fragments. These fragments are cleared and replaced by normal hyaluronan, so the change in the loose connective tissue, along with the fall in stiffness and nerve ending irritation, is more sustained.[35]

How deep friction restores fascial glideThree panels: densified fascia with aggregated hyaluronan and layers locked together; deep friction applying shear and local warmth to the loose connective tissue; and restored fascia where hyaluronan has dispersed and the collagen layers slide independently. A strip below summarises the proposed mechanism. 1 Densified 2 During deep friction 3 Glide restored contact Friction applied Viscosity reduces Collagen layer Loose connective tissue (hyaluronan) Collagen layer Loose connective tissue (hyaluronan) Collagen layer Muscle Hyaluronan chains aggregate; layers move as one Shear and warmth free and fragment the aggregated chains Chains are fragmented and cleared; layers slide independently again WHAT CHANGES AS HYALURONAN IS BROKEN DOWN Aggregated hyaluronan Free hyaluronan Fragmented hyaluronan Stiffness Free nerve ending stimulation Level: Low High Heat alone Temporary Warmth loosens the aggregated chains and the tissue softens, but as it cools the chains can re-aggregate and the area tends to return to its densified state. Deep friction Lasting Shear plus warmth breaks the aggregated chains into fragments, which are cleared and replaced by normal hyaluronan, so the change in the loose connective tissue is more sustained.
The proposed mechanism of deep friction: as hyaluronan moves from an aggregated to a free to a fragmented state, stiffness and nerve ending stimulation fall, and the change lasts longer than with heat alone.[15, 34, 35] Click or tap to enlarge

Applied research on Fascial Manipulation

Alongside the mechanism studies, Fascial Manipulation has been tested in clinical studies, including randomised controlled trials, across a range of musculoskeletal conditions, most often longstanding ones. These studies have looked at outcomes such as pain, disability and movement, and have been brought together in systematic and scoping reviews.[22, 23]

The most recent review pooled the results of 10 randomised trials and found that, on average, pain improved more with Fascial Manipulation than with active comparison treatments.[24] No serious adverse events have been reported.[23] This is a growing area of research, with larger trials continuing to build the evidence.

In practice, Fascial Manipulation is used as a structured clinical reasoning framework for assessment and treatment, alongside exercise and education.

Treatment aims to restore glide in the loose connective tissue, not to reshape collagen.

Bridging Research and Practice

From Anatomy to the FM Model

Luigi Stecco’s model groups the motor units that move a body segment in one direction, together with the fascia, nerves and vessels that link them, into a myofascial unit. Each unit has a Centre of Coordination, where its forces are thought to converge. Units acting in the same direction link into sequences, and Centres of Fusion coordinate the diagonal and spiral movements between them.[4]

A 2023 review set out the anatomical support for treating the myofascial unit, rather than the individual muscle, as the basic element of peripheral motor control.[4] Researchers have also proposed the myofascial unit as part of a framework for assessing non-specific low back pain.[16] These are models: they organise the anatomy into a clinical framework that is still being tested.

The People Behind the Research

Three Generations of Fascia Research

Founder · Physiotherapist

Luigi Stecco

Developed the Fascial Manipulation method over more than 40 years of treating patients with musculoskeletal problems, building its anatomical and biomechanical model.

Orthopaedic Surgeon · Professor of Anatomy, Padua

Prof. Carla Stecco

One of the most widely published fascia researchers, and author of the Functional Atlas of the Human Fascial System.

Rehabilitation Physician · NYU

Asst. Prof. Antonio Stecco

Researches fascial densification and its imaging with ultrasound, through clinical studies of the method.

The Stecco research group has published more than 400 peer-reviewed articles.

Search Their Research on PubMed
Numbered Reference List

The Evidence Behind This Page

  1. Stecco, C., Pratt, R., Nemetz, L. D., Schleip, R., Stecco, A., & Theise, N. D. (2025). Towards a comprehensive definition of the human fascial system. Journal of Anatomy.
  2. Fede, C., Pirri, C., Fan, C., Petrelli, L., Guidolin, D., De Caro, R., & Stecco, C. (2021). A closer look at the cellular and molecular components of the deep/muscular fasciae. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(3), 1411.
  3. Stecco, C. (2014). Functional Atlas of the Human Fascial System. Elsevier Health Sciences.
  4. Stecco, A., Giordani, F., Fede, C., Pirri, C., De Caro, R., & Stecco, C. (2023). From muscle to the myofascial unit: Current evidence and future perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(5), 4527.
  5. Schleip, R., Jäger, H., & Klingler, W. (2012). What is ‘fascia’? A review of different nomenclatures. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 16(4), 496–502.
  6. Maas, H., & Sandercock, T. G. (2010). Force transmission between synergistic skeletal muscles through connective tissue linkages. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology, 2010, 575672.
  7. Maas, H., & Finni, T. (2018). Mechanical coupling between muscle-tendon units reduces peak stresses. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 46(1), 26–33.
  8. Kalichman, L. (2025). Myofascial continuity: Review of anatomical and functional evidence. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 45, 569–575.
  9. Wilke, J., Krause, F., Vogt, L., & Banzer, W. (2016). What is evidence-based about myofascial chains: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(3), 454–461.
  10. Fede, C., Petrelli, L., Guidolin, D., Porzionato, A., Pirri, C., Fan, C., De Caro, R., & Stecco, C. (2021). Evidence of a new hidden neural network into deep fasciae. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 12623.
  11. Suarez-Rodriguez, V., Fede, C., Pirri, C., Petrelli, L., Loro-Ferrer, J. F., Rodriguez-Ruiz, D., De Caro, R., & Stecco, C. (2022). Fascial innervation: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(10), 5674.
  12. Stecco, C., Macchi, V., Porzionato, A., Morra, A., Parenti, A., Stecco, A., et al. (2010). The ankle retinacula: Morphological evidence of the proprioceptive role of the fascial system. Cells Tissues Organs, 192(3), 200–210.
  13. Schilder, A., Hoheisel, U., Magerl, W., Benrath, J., Klein, T., & Treede, R.-D. (2014). Sensory findings after stimulation of the thoracolumbar fascia with hypertonic saline suggest its contribution to low back pain. Pain, 155(2), 222–231.
  14. Kondrup, F., Gaudreault, N., & Venne, G. (2022). The deep fascia and its role in chronic pain and pathological conditions: A review. Clinical Anatomy, 35(5), 649–659.
  15. Pavan, P. G., Stecco, A., Stern, R., & Stecco, C. (2014). Painful connections: Densification versus fibrosis of fascia. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 18(8), 441.
  16. Sikdar, S., Srbely, J., Shah, J., Assefa, Y., Stecco, A., DeStefano, S., Imamura, M., & Gerber, L. H. (2023). A model for personalized diagnostics for non-specific low back pain: The role of the myofascial unit. Frontiers in Pain Research, 4, 1237802.
  17. Langevin, H. M., Fox, J. R., Koptiuch, C., Badger, G. J., Greenan-Naumann, A. C., Bouffard, N. A., et al. (2011). Reduced thoracolumbar fascia shear strain in human chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 203.
  18. Bonaldi, L., Berardo, A., Stecco, A., Stecco, C., & Fontanella, C. G. (2025). Assessment of the fascial system thickness in patients with and without low back pain: A narrative review. Diagnostics, 15, 2059.
  19. Hughes, E. J., McDermott, K., & Funk, M. F. (2019). Evaluation of hyaluronan content in areas of densification compared to adjacent areas of fascia. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 23(2), 324–328.
  20. Pirri, C., Pirri, N., Macchi, V., Porzionato, A., De Caro, R., Özçakar, L., & Stecco, C. (2025). Ultrasonography of the fasciae and common pathologies: The game changer. Diagnostics, 15, 1180.
  21. Isaji, Y., Sasaki, D., Okuyama, K., Kurasawa, Y., Suzuki, K., Kon, Y., & Kitagawa, T. (2025). Therapeutic mechanisms of fascia manipulation: A scoping review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 38(6), 1267–1276.
  22. Arumugam, K., & Harikesavan, K. (2021). Effectiveness of fascial manipulation on pain and disability in musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 25, 230–239.
  23. Isaji, Y., Sasaki, D., Kon, Y., Kurasawa, Y., & Kitagawa, T. (2024). Fascial manipulation for musculoskeletal disorders: A scoping review. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 40, 23–29.
  24. Trybulski, R., Olaniszyn, G., Smoter, M., Clemente, F. M., Vovkanych, A., & Kużdzał, A. (2026). The effects of fascial manipulation on pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 34(1), 4–15.
  25. Biz, C., Stecco, C., Crimì, A., Pirri, C., Fosser, M., Fede, C., Fan, C., Ruggieri, P., & De Caro, R. (2022). Are patellofemoral ligaments and retinacula distinct structures of the knee joint? An anatomic, histological and magnetic resonance imaging study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1110.
  26. Stecco, A., Stecco, C., Macchi, V., Porzionato, A., Ferraro, C., Masiero, S., & De Caro, R. (2011). RMI study and clinical correlations of ankle retinacula damage and outcomes of ankle sprain. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 33(10), 881–890.
  27. Brandl, A., Egner, C., Reer, R., Schmidt, T., & Schleip, R. (2022). Associations between deformation of the thoracolumbar fascia and activation of the erector spinae and multifidus muscle in patients with acute low back pain and healthy controls: A matched pair case-control study. Life, 12(11), 1735.
  28. James, G., Stecco, C., Blomster, L., Hall, L., Schmid, A. B., Shu, C. C., Little, C. B., Melrose, J., & Hodges, P. W. (2022). Muscle spindles of the multifidus muscle undergo structural change after intervertebral disc degeneration. European Spine Journal, 31(7), 1879–1888.
  29. James, G., Ahern, B., Goodwin, W., Goss, B., & Hodges, P. (2025). Structural changes of muscle spindles in the multifidus muscle after intervertebral disk injury are resolved by targeted activation of the muscle. European Spine Journal.
  30. Vulfsons, S., Chervonenko, S., Haddad, M., Weisman, M. H., Lavi, N., & Dar, G. (2018). Decreased amplitude of surface electromyographic recordings of muscle activation along the posterior myofascial kinematic chain in subjects with chronic nonspecific low back pain compared to healthy subjects. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 31(4), 785–793.
  31. Van Deun, S., Staes, F. F., Stappaerts, K. H., Janssens, L., Levin, O., & Peers, K. K. H. (2007). Relationship of chronic ankle instability to muscle activation patterns during the transition from double-leg to single-leg stance. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 35(2), 274–281.
  32. Bullock-Saxton, J. E. (1994). Local sensation changes and altered hip muscle function following severe ankle sprain. Physical Therapy, 74(1), 17–31.
  33. Garofolini, A., & Svanera, D. (2019). Fascial organisation of motor synergies: A hypothesis. European Journal of Translational Myology, 29(3), 185–194.
  34. Menon, R. G., Oswald, S. F., Raghavan, P., Regatte, R. R., & Stecco, A. (2020). T1ρ-mapping for musculoskeletal pain diagnosis: Case series of variation of water bound glycosaminoglycans quantification before and after Fascial Manipulation® in subjects with elbow pain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 708.
  35. Stecco, A., Bonaldi, L., Fontanella, C. G., Stecco, C., & Pirri, C. (2023). The effect of mechanical stress on hyaluronan fragments’ inflammatory cascade: Clinical implications. Life, 13(12), 2277.
  36. Willard, F. H., Vleeming, A., Schuenke, M. D., Danneels, L., & Schleip, R. (2012). The thoracolumbar fascia: Anatomy, function and clinical considerations. Journal of Anatomy, 221(6), 507–536.

Ready to Put the Science Into Practice?

Fascial Manipulation Level 1 turns this anatomy into a repeatable clinical assessment and treatment framework.

Learn More About Level 1

New to the method? Start with What Is Fascial Manipulation?, or email education@melbourneathleticdevelopment.com.au